Date: 2012-03-13 01:40 am (UTC)
I should have written what I meant been more clear. I think Julie and Jason's premise was that kids make you awful, when combined with romance. And I guess it just strikes me as implausible that thinking that would make them decide the solution was to have a baby with a non-romantic partner. Because, in the end, what stops you from hating your non-romantic co-parent? Surely there are other challenges that could make two people go to war besides the romance being stifled.

I'll bow to your parent-wisdom with the babies, but that dinner party scene just struck me because they really never seemed to have real challenges; we see the baby cry and cry once, but her co-parent wanders in and makes the baby stop crying immediately. All other problems are solved with money. I would have liked to see some challenges; are divorced parents really that much happier that married or partnered parents?


MJ and Jason had to be dating for almost a year, because they met when the kid was barely verbal and continued to date through that scene at the restaurant when the kid was a few months from 2.

I actually thought the Jon Hamm scene sided with Jason pretty clearly. Ben's a drunk and a jerk who can't hold his temper and is mean to his wife, and Jason makes a huge speech about how much he loves his co-parent and they'll make it work, damnit.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

diaphenia: (Default)
diaphenia

December 2020

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728 293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 26th, 2025 08:33 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios